Sunday, December 13, 2009
Press Release About December 7th 2009 Event
Thursday, November 5, 2009
The Scars of the Past Providing Compassion and Healing
Tuesday, November 3, 2009
Lending My Voice for the MS Society
Ojakian Tennis Celebrity Pro-Am to End MS event needs you! They are looking for more kids and adults to register to play in the clinics, amateurs for the pro-am, and people to attend the cocktail party & auction. Please join me in supporting them on November 14th.
- The opportunity to play doubles with a pro or celebrity in the Pro-Am Tournament ($500), includes lunch & cocktail reception
- Evening cocktail reception ($100), includes Pro-Am admission, a pro exhibition match and silent and live auction
- Junior & adult tennis clinics, including lunch ($30 and $40 each), includes lunch
- Stadium seating to watch the tournament ($25)
- Celebrities in attendance -Matthew Perry, Gavin Rossdale, Jamie-Lynn Sigler, Brody Jenner, Sendhil Ramamurthy, Alan Thicke, Linda Thompson, Matthew Lillard, Wayne Bryan
- Professional tennis players include: Tracy Austin, Pam Shriver, Derek Rostagno, Bill Scanlon, Katrina Adams, Taylor Dent, Michael Chang, Elliot Teltscher, Chuck Adams, V.J. Armitraj, Scott Davis
Sunday, November 1, 2009
Feds argue Massachusetts can't force same-sex marriage benefits By DEVLIN BARRETT
Originally printed (Issue 1744 - Between The Lines News)
WASHINGTON (AP) - States that allow same-sex marriage can't force the federal government to provide benefits to those couples, the Obama administration argued Friday in court papers in a lawsuit by Massachusetts.
The Justice Department is at odds with Massachusetts - the first state to allow same-sex marriage - over a 1996 federal law defining marriage as a union between a man and a woman.
Massachusetts sued in July, saying that law is discriminatory and deprives gay couples in the state of some federal spousal benefits.
The Obama administration agrees the Defense of Marriage Act, or DOMA, is discriminatory and wants it repealed, but says it has an obligation to defend laws enacted by Congress while they are on the books and can be reasonably defended.
The law "does not prohibit gay and lesbian couples from marrying, nor does it prohibit the states from acknowledging same-sex marriages," according to the court filing by Assistant Attorney General Tony West.
Massachusetts, the filing continues, is trying to claim individuals have a right to federal benefits based on marital status.
"There is, however, no fundamental right to marriage-based federal benefits," according to the 36-page filing.
The 1996 law denies federal recognition of same-sex marriage and gives states the right to refuse to recognize same-sex marriages performed in other states.
Massachusetts is the first state to sue the government over the DOMA law. Some gay couples have filed their own lawsuits challenging the law, but this case is unique in pitting a state against the federal government over the issue.
Justice Dept. spokeswoman Tracy Schmaler said any state "can allow gay and lesbian citizens to marry and can make its own decisions about how to treat married couples when it comes to state benefits."
"Massachusetts is not being denied the right to provide benefits to same-sex couples and, in fact, has enacted a law to provide equal health benefits to same-sex spouses," she said.
In earlier filings, the government has sought to dismiss the DOMA lawsuits brought by individuals.
The Massachusetts case could also have implications for Democratic Party politics. The Massachusetts Attorney General, Martha Coakley, is trying to win the Senate seat of the late Edward Kennedy, at the same time her office is leading the lawsuit against the Democratic administration on the issue of gay rights.
The lawsuit brought by Massachusetts says the approximately 16,000 same-sex couples who have married since the state allowed it in 2004 are being unfairly denied federal benefits given to heterosexual couples.
Those benefits include federal income tax credits, employment benefits, retirement benefits, health insurance coverage and Social Security payments, the lawsuit says.
The lawsuit also argues that the federal law requires the state to violate the constitutional rights of its citizens by treating married heterosexual couples and married same-sex couples differently when determining eligibility for Medicaid benefits and when determining whether the spouse of a veteran can be buried in a Massachusetts veterans' cemetery.
Besides Massachusetts, five other states - Connecticut, Vermont, New Hampshire, Maine and Iowa - have legalized gay marriage.
Saturday, October 24, 2009
Ten Simple Ideas To Eliminate Homophobia
Monday, October 12, 2009
Across the Nation, The Media Outs Mr. Obama for his Lack of Gay Rights Support
From Time Magazine:
Obama's Gay Outreach: All Talk, No Action
"Obama did pledge — as he has before — to end the Pentagon's "Don't ask, don't tell" policy. But once again he said nothing specific about how he plans to do that and didn't acknowledge that he already has the statutory power to instruct the Pentagon that investigating service members' sexuality is not in the best interest of the armed forces. Also, he said that gay relationships can be "just as real and admirable" as straight relationships, but he did not say gay couples should be treated equally. Obama, after all, still opposes equal marriage rights."
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1929687,00.html
From The New York Times:
In the nine months since, Mr. Obama has made only limited progress on the issues that are important to gays. He has pushed for hate crime legislation, and a bill, approved in the House on Thursday, now appears headed for passage. He has put forth a package of domestic partnership benefits for federal workers, but faced criticism that the effort did not include health benefits. He has said he would push to repeal the Defense of Marriage Act, which allows states to refuse to recognize same-sex marriages in other states, but it remains on the books.
But of all the issues Mr. Obama has vowed to address, the Clinton-era “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy is perhaps the one that stirs the most emotion. Mr. Obama said Saturday night that he was working with the Pentagon and with House and Senate leaders to repeal the policy, but many gay rights supporters have accused him of dragging his feet.
In the days before the speech, many advocates for gay rights said they hoped he would lay out a timetable for overturning the policy or otherwise offer specifics on how he will achieve his goal.
“An opportunity was missed tonight,” Aubrey Sarvis, executive director of Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, which represents gay and lesbian soldiers, said in a statement afterward.
From Politico:
President Obama offers little new in speech to gay rights activists at HRC dinner
But while the speech was applauded in the hall, reaction outside of it was was harsher, with many prominent gay voices concerned by the president's lack of specifics.
Prominent gay blogger John Aravosis, in a post titled "Where's the Beef?", wrote that "Obama repeated his campaign promises. That was it."
"An opportunity was missed tonight," said Kevin Dix of the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, which had urged Obama to set a deadline for ending Don't Ask Don't Tell. "When are we going to get this done? We didn't hear any of that tonight."
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1009/28156.html
From the Dallas Morning News:
"We were hoping that [Obama] would come through on some of his campaign promises faster than he has," said Erin Moore, president of the Stonewall Democrats of Dallas, an activist group. "We're still hopeful that something will happen, but the window of opportunity is closing very rapidly."
Rob Schlein, president of the gay activist group Log Cabin Republicans of Dallas, said Obama missed an opportunity to change the policy when his Justice Department urged the U.S. Supreme Court not to hear a case addressing the issue.
"His administration promises one thing and does another," Schlein said.
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/nation/stories/101109dnnatdontask
Wednesday, September 23, 2009
Why I am Not Marching on Washington
=

